
In his weekly “Joe Fridays” column over at Newsarama, Marvel Editor-in-Chief comments on the controversial Heroes for Hentai Hire cover that sparked the latest in a seemingly increasing number of controversies related to Marvel and DC representations of women and minorities in their superhero comics:
How about the Heroes for Hire #13? This has caused some controversy of its own, with some people likening it to a very unsavory recurring element in some more adult-themed manga?
JQ: This one I can answer to. First, I think people are reading way too much into that cover than was ever intended. I heard terms such as “tentacle rape” being thrown around when that in no way is what’s happening, nor does it happen in the book. Those tentacles are the arms of the Brood who appears in the issue and is a major story point, the Brood have tentacles, sorry about that.
Secondly, the concept for that cover, soup to nuts came from a female artist. Thirdly, not being a deep follower of manga, I have no idea what recurring theme people are referring to or concerned with. While I appreciate the sentiment and the feelings that some may have about this, I honestly feel that there is way too much being read into this cover.
Also, HFH is a book that features two strong, lead female protagonist who kick major ass; somehow folks have forgotten to focus on that.
Quesada’s evasive and purposefully ignorant response was the last bit of convincing I needed that it’s not simply that I’m no longer Marvel’s (or DC’s) target demographic, but like Timberland and Cristal with the hip-hop community, I am actively Not Wanted. I thought that was something worth fighting against at first, and then I kept seeing the increasingly overblown analogies to Civil Rights being made by some, and equally petty responses to opposing viewpoints coming from the presumed “good” side of the debate, and realized how overblown this whole thing has become.
I’m not saying other people shouldn’t fight this fight — I was particularly delighted to see Tamora Pierce stand up and add her voice to the dissenters, and would love to see other notable creators take a similar public stance, for or against — but I now realize that my limited energies, and dollars, are better spent elsewhere. Marvel and DC won’t be the first publishers I’ve removed from my personal radar, but they’ll certainly be the most significant. While I’ll surely miss some of the steadily diminishing handful of their titles I was still pulling every month, I’ll get over it pretty quickly.
There’s plenty of pre-Quesada and pre-Didio Essential and Showcase TPBs for me to get an unsullied fix of my favorite characters while not completely forfeiting my “right to vote”, as it were. And, of course, there’s a slew of comics being published by other companies that are a better fit for my tastes and more deserving of my attention, superhero and otherwise, delivering the same if not superior level of production values and creative content. Some may see this as throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but I’m at the point now where I can see the appeal of simply burning down the house and rebuilding from scratch.
My house, that is; what the rest of the neighborhood chooses to do is their business.
For those who continue the fight, more power to you and best of luck to your cause, just don’t get so caught up in it that you lose sight of what’s really important. It’s not simply about Mary Jane, Misty Knight, Bill Foster or John Stewart being written or drawn out of character, if represented at all. They are mere saplings in a forest full of long-standing but rotten-to-the-core redwoods.
PS: As for Newsarama, I pretty much only follow the blog these days, but the sheer lameness of Brady’s unabashed shillery in that Joe Friday “interview” killed the last shred of credibility the site had in my mind. While infinitely less important in the big picture, I’m done with them, too.