<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next-To-Last Word: The Incredible Hulk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Django</title>
		<link>http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/comment-page-1/#comment-440708</link>
		<dc:creator>Django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/#comment-440708</guid>
		<description>I have to agree only somewhat on that.

Ever hear of the theory of the Uncanny Valley?  It basically states that technology aping life is fascinating, but as it edges closer &amp; closer to photorealism WE become hyper-sensitive to its subtle faults- and find it REVULSIVE.

This theory cracks the inherent problems of Rhythm &amp; Hues in a nutshell.

They NEED to combine their CG work w/ some animatronic or puppet (Henson, Dark Crystal-Labyrinth-Era) type work, so that physical actors have something to interact with, and audiences are thrown trying to figure what&#039;s fake &amp; what&#039;s real; as opposed to KNOWING it&#039;s all fake.

WETA Digital CLEARLY understood this w/ LOTR, and lost its way w/ King Kong.  Guillermo Del Toro, on the other hand, TOTALLY GETS IT (which is why he&#039;s perfect for the Hobbit.)

That said, I am SO, SO, SO LOOKING FORWARD to a better adaptation of Hulk than Ang Lee&#039;s.

I&#039;m a lifelong comic fan, Hulk specifically.  The whole point of Comic Movies for us fans is getting SHARE w/ non-comic fans &amp; friends the joy that we get from these &quot;imaginary tales&quot;, on screen.

By any measure, Letterier&#039;s film  looks like a REAL contender.

If he does a three-quel, just be sure to throw in some animatronic Hulk hands, or Banner/Hulk tranformation monsters.

(And in any case, Tim Blake Nelson will be in Makeup as opposed to CG, so the Uncanny Valley rule will automatically be bridged.)

GO HULK!  SMASH BOX OFFICE EXPECTATIONS!  DO NOT RELENT! ! !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree only somewhat on that.</p>
<p>Ever hear of the theory of the Uncanny Valley?  It basically states that technology aping life is fascinating, but as it edges closer &amp; closer to photorealism WE become hyper-sensitive to its subtle faults- and find it REVULSIVE.</p>
<p>This theory cracks the inherent problems of Rhythm &amp; Hues in a nutshell.</p>
<p>They NEED to combine their CG work w/ some animatronic or puppet (Henson, Dark Crystal-Labyrinth-Era) type work, so that physical actors have something to interact with, and audiences are thrown trying to figure what&#8217;s fake &amp; what&#8217;s real; as opposed to KNOWING it&#8217;s all fake.</p>
<p>WETA Digital CLEARLY understood this w/ LOTR, and lost its way w/ King Kong.  Guillermo Del Toro, on the other hand, TOTALLY GETS IT (which is why he&#8217;s perfect for the Hobbit.)</p>
<p>That said, I am SO, SO, SO LOOKING FORWARD to a better adaptation of Hulk than Ang Lee&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a lifelong comic fan, Hulk specifically.  The whole point of Comic Movies for us fans is getting SHARE w/ non-comic fans &amp; friends the joy that we get from these &#8220;imaginary tales&#8221;, on screen.</p>
<p>By any measure, Letterier&#8217;s film  looks like a REAL contender.</p>
<p>If he does a three-quel, just be sure to throw in some animatronic Hulk hands, or Banner/Hulk tranformation monsters.</p>
<p>(And in any case, Tim Blake Nelson will be in Makeup as opposed to CG, so the Uncanny Valley rule will automatically be bridged.)</p>
<p>GO HULK!  SMASH BOX OFFICE EXPECTATIONS!  DO NOT RELENT! ! !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfp</title>
		<link>http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/comment-page-1/#comment-440465</link>
		<dc:creator>nfp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popcultureshock.com/the-next-to-last-word-the-incredible-hulk/43781/#comment-440465</guid>
		<description>INCREDIBLE HULK? This second film will,of course will have the upper hand with stellar actors Edward Norton,Liv Tyler &amp; Tim Roth amongst many others, bringing the story together in the best fashion, BUT.... CGI HULK? Hollywood,Stan Lee? Hollywood your doing it bigger but in this case NOT better. Stan Lee you should not stand for it. Bring us a REAL HULK with stellar actors,cgi where necessary and you have the formula for creating a new standard for super heroe stories that will always have people WAITING for what your doing next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INCREDIBLE HULK? This second film will,of course will have the upper hand with stellar actors Edward Norton,Liv Tyler &amp; Tim Roth amongst many others, bringing the story together in the best fashion, BUT&#8230;. CGI HULK? Hollywood,Stan Lee? Hollywood your doing it bigger but in this case NOT better. Stan Lee you should not stand for it. Bring us a REAL HULK with stellar actors,cgi where necessary and you have the formula for creating a new standard for super heroe stories that will always have people WAITING for what your doing next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

