Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Meta |
Random Thoughts on Publishing, Archaia
June 5th, 2007
by Guy LeCharles Gonzalez
In which I ramble semi-coherently about publishing, BEA and Archaia Studios Press… New York Magazine has an interesting article about Random House — “the largest of the dozen major commercial publishers” and home to comics-friendly imprints like Villard, Pantheon and Del Rey Manga — that sheds some light on how the behemoth publisher operates.
There’s a great graphic that makes the point that, “[o]ut of every eight books, one is very profitable, one is very unprofitable, and six either break even or lose money.” Those are some tough odds, but it helps to put them in perspective. I was talking to the sales director for a mid-sized niche publisher with a handful of imprints at BEA last week, and he pointed out that the vast majority of their books have initial print runs of only 10,000 copies and almost all of them are profitable at that level, usually selling out within the first year. The bigger hits then continue to generate revenue from the backlist, while print-on-demand technology enables even the marginal sellers to remain in print, a point of contention for many writers that will need to addressed in contracts. Archaia Studios Press — nicely represented at BEA with a dedicated space in Diamond’s communal area, with their beautiful hardcovers on display and Mark Smylie and Brian Petkash singing their praises — hit a home run with Mouse Guard, the $24.95 hardcover collection of which has reportedly sold 25,000 copies, the majority of them outside of the direct market. The non-returnable 7,000 they moved through the direct market probably covered their printing costs and then some, so there’s their one very profitable title, and with more Mouse Guard to come, it should have a nice steady life on their backlist. But wait…! Interestingly, Villard (a Random House imprint) picked up the trade paperback rights to Mouse Guard earlier this year, so it’s very likely that they will benefit from backlist sales more than Archaia, a not infrequent occurence as smaller publishers simply can’t compete with the big houses (or their imprints) when they come calling for the talent they’ve nurtured. It’s a Catch-22! Nevertheless, when it comes to making the f**king comics, Archaia is doing things the right way, expanding slowly but steadily with a clear editorial vision, while publishing high-quality books that appeal to both the direct market and traditional bookstores. They’re about to relaunch their web site, which has perhaps been their only weak spot, and I’m planning to do a video interview / studio tour with Smylie later this summer after they’ve moved and settled in to their new digs. If you haven’t checked out any of their comics yet, you’re definitely missing out. I highly recommend Artesia, Mouse Guard, Robotika and The Lone and Level Sands, and of their current slate of floppies, The Killer and Okko: The Cycle of Water have been the most notable standouts in a generally excellent lineup of titles. (Random House article via GalleyCat) |



3 Comments Add your own
1. TheDeeMan | June 6th, 2007 at 8:08 am
Another catch 22 for comic and graphic novelist trying to take advantage of manstream publishings interest in comics/graphic novels is in their submissions. Villard, Pantheon, Philomel, Del Ray, etc, are delving into a new genre of publishing (graphic novels) but in a way that’s as old as the dawn of time–Through agented submissions. Literary agents frown o most childrens book submissions, much less what they consider children’s “funny book” submissions aka comics/graphic novels. Believe me I know. I’ve been trying to submit my book “GAAK” for the past 3 months and literary agents seem TOTALLY UNAWARE of the recent surge in graphic novel publishing that’s begun in recent months. So I wonder where are these publishers like Villard, Philomel, etc, getting their graphic novels from? Because it sure isn’t from comic book creators because comic book creators sure as hell can’t get the agents required to submit the comic books/graphic novels they create. Like I said, it’s a catch 22.
Dee - GAAK writer dude
2. Guy LeCharles Gonzalez | June 6th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Graphic novels are one of the fastest growing segments in publishing right now, so every publisher is on the lookout for under-the-radar projects being published by smaller publishers that they can snatch up. There’s a lot of comics fans working in traditional publishing, too, so I know some of the recent pick-ups have come about somewhat organically that way.
The best bet for an unestablished name to get on the bigger publishers’ radars is to bust their ass getting their work out there, either going through one of the smaller direct market publishers or self-publishing, and then marketing the hell out of themselves and their work. Networking is very important, too, as like any industry, knowing the right people doesn’t hurt, and if you’re part of a collective and one of your partners breaks in, you’re one step closer.
PS: Literary agents only work when there are significant contracts in play. 15% of the average graphic novel contract isn’t worth their time or effort. I suspect you may start to see newer agents looking to carve a niche for themselves by focusing on graphic novels as a specialty, but like the clients they’ll likely represent, they’ll be working at a competitive disadvantage. Still, it’s something to consider…
3. TheDeeMan | June 7th, 2007 at 7:02 am
Ah, yes. The old “don’t call us, we’ll call you” policy. Well, it would be a lot easier for “us” to find them then for them to find us.
Dee - GAAK writer dude
Leave a Comment
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed