10 Nov, 2009

Soul Eater, Vol. 1

By: Ken Haley

souleater1By Atsushi Ohkubo
Yen Press, 208 pp.
Rating: Older teen

Maka is a Scythe Meister, a wielder of a living weapon that assumes human form. In her case it’s a scythe that goes by the name of Soul. Together the duo have only one goal: to eat 99 human souls, followed by one witch soul. Once they do this Soul will have reached his full potential and can go on to become the scythe of Death himself!

Oddly enough, the basic concept reminds me of Pokemon, but instead of cute lil’ monsters the main characters have to collect a certain number of souls to become to the living weapon for Shinigami, a/k/a Death. Beyond that very basic premise, Soul Eater is actually quite confusing. For example, I’m not sure if the opening trio of stories, listed as prologues in the contents, are in continuity, some form of beta for the series, or what. This is a bit of a problem since there are a few contradictions between them and the main story that makes up the second half of the book. The most glaring of these the fact that Maka and Soul have apparently only one soul to go before Soul becomes the perfect weapon for Death in the prologues, but in the main story they haven’t eaten a single soul. If the prologue was supposed to be some sort of glimpse into the future to show what they’ll be capable of it still doesn’t make sense since Blair’s kicking around and the prologue tale depicted their first meeting. I suppose the problems with the prologues could potentially be due to some sort of mislabeling on Yen’s part, not that mislabeling explains the internal problems with the main story itself. Oh, and I haven’t even mentioned the horribly clichéd humor, including comedic overreactions, nose bleeds, girls smacking around boys, and more.

Ohkubo’s artwork is okay but I’m not really a fan of his style. The character designs felt like they were trying too hard to be hip and cool, but I think they missed their mark since most end up being forgettably bland with the exception of Blair, but she’s only memorable because she’s dressed in your typical sexy witch getup and that’s something that will always stick out. Frankly, the most eye-catching aspects of the artwork are the settings. Whether it’s the faces present on both the Sun and the Moon, strange locales like the graveyard full of hooks hanging from trees, or the weird, cartoonishly gothic cities, the backgrounds are all interesting. The action sequences are servicable but hardly jaw-droppingly amazing. Ohkubo does a fairly good job at utilizing the concept of humans who turn into weapons, though. The third prologue features two twin women who turn into handguns. For one scene the two jump back and forth, taking turns wielding each other and using the size and shape change to avoid attacks in an action scene that’s the high point of the book.

Overall, I really felt this book was a bit of a mess. The story’s all over the place thanks to the prologues and other inconsitancies, and the tired clichéd humor is painfully unfunny. If that wasn’t enough, the various fan service moments that come in the form of panty shots and a completely superfluous page of Blair in the shower feel out of place and horribly pandering. Clearly, Soul Eater has an audience out there, but at the same time it’s pretty clear that I’m not it since I didn’t think much of the book at all.

Volume one of Soul Eater is available now.

Review copy provided by the publisher.

9 Responses to "Soul Eater, Vol. 1"

1 | Insomnic

November 10th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Avatar

The issue with the 99 souls was spelled out quite clearly – they lost them as a punishment. Death specifically states that since they ate the wrong soul as their witches soul then they would forfeit all previous souls and have to start over. If that part confused you then I’m not sure I can accept your estimation that the rest of the story is confusing.

Even your brief description of the story is inaccurate. Are you sure you actually read this book or just flipped through it at Borders and stopped at the sexy dressed girl?

Personally, I think the art is interesting and movement is expressed very well – but art style is completely up to taste. I do like that it’s different than the standard manga art style.

The story is interesting and handles the macabre with humor and I can see a potential for the story to evolve. I have seen the anime so I know some of what to expect and I’m happy to be returning to some characters that I’ve thoroughly enjoyed.

I only recently found your site and even added your RSS, but this review has convinced me that this site is not worth following.

2 | Michelle Smith

November 10th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Avatar

Insomnic, you are welcome to offer a contrasting opinion on the book itself, but any comments that insult the reviewer and his integrity will not be tolerated.

3 | Ken Haley

November 10th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

Avatar

Insomnic, you’re partly right. There’s one word bubble at the end of the first prologue where Maka says they have to start again, but they never give an explanation of why. I’ve gone over the book a few times looking for it since you mentioned it annnd.. it’s not there. It’s not mentioned in the Prologues and it’s not mentioned in the Main Story either. If it was in the anime, perhaps it was added for clarity..? Alternatively, maybe it’s in the original manga and is missing due to a translation mistake or misprint..? Either way, it’s not there.

4 | Grant

November 10th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

Avatar

Ken, I agree with you 100% of the way. The scenery is awesome. Almost everything else is a mess.

6 | Demio

November 11th, 2009 at 12:04 am

Avatar

I disagree with “D+”

7 | Eldwarfo

January 8th, 2010 at 11:44 pm

Avatar

ken.. I’m going to have to assume you’re illiterate. in some dialogue at the end of maka’s section it’s stated that because blair’s soul was of a cat and not a witch they have to start over. I don’t know why you’re looking for an explanation. it’s obvious the souls must be acquired in the correct sequence.

8 | Eldwarfo

January 8th, 2010 at 11:45 pm

Avatar

or you could just be stupid.

9 | Michelle Smith

January 9th, 2010 at 4:35 pm

Avatar

Aaaaaaaaand now comments are locked on this post. Seriously, folks, if you can’t disagree without personal attacks, then you jeopardize the forum we give you for civil discussion.

Tags